Human Resources (question answering about knowledge) algorithm and breasonings for the Philosophy ideas

Based on previous data about a subject's knowledge (additions to which are entered after spiritually asking in response to a computer screen prompt), the algorithm asks whether they agree with the thesis, asks them to summarise the idea and resynthesise it.

The algorithm doesn't ask for answers twice about its own knowledge of the idea, but doesn't assume a subject's knowledge.

The algorithm mind reads what algorithm parts (and parts being thought of in relation to these parts) from past knowledge are lighting up, where it has asked how the algorithms are grouped to the subject, to speed up finding the relevant part.

Mind reading time points in the day should be chronologically ordered and questions asked then.  The top of 3 groups of time point determination should be taken, so subjects can react to each other. x hand-enter data from representations, not mind read, but test mind reading first.

E.g. question asking the tester to determine how the idea can be resynthesised (what parts of it can be processed) recursively, and so what knowledge can fit into its categories, such as an item, a list or a list of lists.

Question asking the tester - what parts of speech do words have - what words can connect - what is e.g. agreement (containing all positive terms, versus disagreement, which must contain a negative term, e.g. "not") - how do the knowledge ideas and ideas to resynthesise have relevance (e.g. that (the property) similarity in students' work is negative - linking to arguments on a side indicated by a subject at first for this idea.

The algorithm should telepathically-hypothesise (see what has lit up) and question along lines.

The algorithm should prepare its knowledge by asking until requirements (i.e. it has found what subjects want to do, and how they will do it, and how their answers fit these parts) have been met.

x just write idea algs
The algorithm will ask the subjects what they interpret the contention as - and what conditions each side has, which side they agree with and the reasons for these, etc.

When mixtures are mentioned, explore the main point, then the main point about this until they are resolved.

The programmer should check the grammar of questions the chat bot might ask - where answers are assumed to be in sentence form.

The computer is too slow, so write the algorithm and request that computations are instant (quantum).  x Mind reader should project and detect object representations, not words.  Understanding of the knowledge should be trained and assessed before open ended questions asked, such as those with precomputed likely answers, that connect parts discussed.  The answers are connections between ideas, which are linked through the same type, with clarification of other types the ideas have (and objections to the ideas as represented by the wrong type for a condition, and which condition is stronger).  The same word may have different meanings.

Decide on objects meant by algorithms (given appropriate choices for who the subject is).

A song should play when it is expected and the subjects should write short algorithms to resolve their thoughts.